股票這個價位要不要買論文書籍站
german generals and 的問題，透過圖書和論文來找解法和答案更準確安心。 我們找到下列股價、配息、目標價等股票新聞資訊
german generals and 的問題，我們搜遍了碩博士論文和台灣出版的書籍，推薦Mitcham, Samuel W.寫的 The Encyclopedia of Confederate Generals 和Knudsen, Harold M.的 The Confederacy’s Most Modern General: James Longstreet and the American Civil War都 可以從中找到所需的評價。
這兩本書分別來自 和所出版 。
國立政治大學 亞太研究英語碩士學位學程(IMAS) 冷則剛所指導 陳維倫的 未來技術與未來競爭：人工智能在中美關係中的作用 （2020），提出german generals and 關鍵因素是什麼，來自於中美關係、人工智能、太空競賽、冷戰、全球化、大國競爭。
而第二篇論文國立政治大學 外交學系 張文揚所指導 古惠如的 探討威權政體型態與溫室氣體排放之間的關聯性：1972-2014年 （2020），提出因為有 威權政體型態、氣候變遷、環境治理的重點而找出了 german generals and 的解答。
The Encyclopedia of Confederate Generals
為了解決german generals and 的問題，作者Mitcham, Samuel W. 這樣論述：
SAMUEL W. MITCHAM JR. is a military historian who has written extensively on the German army in the Second World War, including his major biography of Field Marshal Erwin Rommel, Desert Fox. A U.S. Army helicopter pilot in the Vietnam War and a graduate of the Command and General Staff College, he r
emained active in the reserves, qualifying through the rank of major general. A former visiting professor at the U.S. Military Academy, West Point, he has appeared on the History Channel, CBS, NPR, and the BBC. He lives with his family in Monroe, Louisiana.
未來技術與未來競爭：人工智能在中美關係中的作用
為了解決german generals and 的問題，作者陳維倫 這樣論述：
過去大國之間的技術競爭被用來檢驗大國的意識形態優勢，同時也創造了一個非軍事領域的競爭。 雖然太空競賽是最著名的科技競賽，但美國和中國目前正在進行一項新的競賽：人工智能競賽。 正在進行的 人工智能競賽 與 太空競賽 有許多相似之處。 本文通過比較兩種競爭來探討全球化如何影響技術競爭，發現新參與者的加入是技術競爭中最顯著的轉變。
The Confederacy’s Most Modern General: James Longstreet and the American Civil War
為了解決german generals and 的問題，作者Knudsen, Harold M. 這樣論述：
The Civil War is often called the first "modern war." Sandwiched between the Napoleonic Wars and World War I, the Civil War spawned a host of "firsts" and is often looked upon as a precursor to the larger and more deadly 20th century conflicts. Confederate General James Longstreet made some of the m
ost profound modern contributions to the art of war. Retired Lieutenant Colonel Harold M. Knudsen explains what he did and how he did it in The Confederacy's Most Modern General: James Longstreet and the American Civil War.Initially, commanders on both sides extensively utilized Napoleonic tactics t
hat were obsolete because of the advent of the rifled musket and better artillery. Some professional army officers, like Union Generals U. S. Grant and William T. Sherman, worked to improve tactics, operations, and strategies. On the Confederate side, a careful comparison of Longstreet's body of wor
k in the field to modern military doctrine reveals several large-scale innovations. He understood early that the tactical defense was generally dominant over the offense, which was something few grasped in 1862. His thinking demonstrated a clear evolution beginning on the field at First Manassas in
July 1861. It developed through the bloody fighting of 1862, and culminated in the brilliant defensive victory at Fredericksburg that December. The lethality with which his riflemen mowed down repeated Union assaults hinted at what was to come in World War I. Longstreet's ability to launch and contr
ol powerful offensives was on display at Second Manassas in August 1862, and his offensive plan at Chickamauga in Georgia the following September was similar, if not the forerunner to, World War II tactical-level German armored tactics. Other areas show progressive applications with artillery, staff
work, force projection, and operational-level thinking.LTC Knudsen's thoughtful study ties comparatives from the Napoleonic era through World War II and beyond back to the Civil War, and in doing so, demonstrates that Longstreet evolved his thinking across several battles, and how his innovations a
ppeared in future wars. Longstreet was not the sole agent of all modern change away from the Napoleonic method, but his contributions were very significant, executed on a large scale, and demonstrated that he was a modern thinker unparalleled in the Confederate Army.Unfortunately, many Civil War stu
dents have a one-sided view of Longstreet. His legacy fell victim to bitter postwar Southern politics when "Old Pete" supported Reconstruction bills, accepted postings with the Grant Administration, and dared to criticize General Robert E. Lee. His military record was attacked by Lost Cause proponen
ts who viewed his politics and actions as scandalous. More modern writers have taken up the cudgel with their pens, skewing the general's legacy.The Confederacy's Most Modern General draws heavily on 20th Century Army doctrine, field training, staff planning, command, and combat experience, and is t
he first serious treatment of Longstreet's generalship vis a vis modern warfare. Not everyone will agree with LTC's Knudsen's conclusions, but it will now be impossible to write about the general without referencing this important study.
探討威權政體型態與溫室氣體排放之間的關聯性：1972-2014年
為了解決german generals and 的問題，作者古惠如 這樣論述：
由於威權主義的研究為我們呈現文官威權、皇室與軍事等各類型威權政體型態的多元性，本研究欲探討的問題為不同的威權政體型態是否針對氣候變遷危機的應對能力亦有所差異？依據氣候變遷危機在政治層面上，特別是威權國家，所形成的挑戰，本研究提出威權政體型態在攏絡社會與穩定統治之兩種面向的能力上可能發展出差異，且分別以文官威權、君主政體型態為具備該項優勢的代表。透過從1972年到2014年間的威權政體型態作為研究的主要解釋變數，以及人均二氧化碳排放量作為結果變數，本研究依據大樣本數據的量化分析後發現：在所有威權政體型態中，君主威權政體型態對於排放量的傾向是負向影響，顯示其為表現較好的威權政體型態；軍事政體的表
現則次之，以包含一黨、有限多黨政體型態的文官威權作為表現最差的類型。前述的排序在納入經濟、資源消耗、人口等控制變數後並沒有改變，此外，使用其他作者所分類的威權政體型態也大抵呈現君主政體型態的優勢以及文官威權政體型態的劣勢。據此，本研究認為有關於攏絡社會能力與穩定統治能力對氣候治理之表現差異所形成的競爭性解釋，以君主政體型態之減碳表現具備統計上的顯著影響而以穩定統治作為較具影響力的解釋。本研究最後認為未來的探討方現有針對中東與北非地區之君主國家形成較深入的個案研究，亦或是形成比較研究之必要，以幫助我們增進威權主義與氣候治理之間的學術對話。