1979 NBA draft的問題，透過圖書和論文來找解法和答案更準確安心。 我們找到下列股價、配息、目標價等股票新聞資訊

The NBA in Black and White: The Memoir of a Trailblazing NBA Player and Coach

為了解決1979 NBA draft的問題，作者Scott, Ray,Rosen, Charley 這樣論述：

Philly native John Raymond ＂Ray＂ Scott’s college career began at the University of Portland, and he was chosen as the 4th pick in the 1961 NBA draft by the Detroit Pistons. He spent six years with the Pistons, as a stand-out rebounder and deadly shooter from the perimeter, and another five years pla

ying for other teams. Then in October 1972, Scott was promoted from Assistant to Head Coach of the Detroit Pistons, thanks in part to the strong support from retiring coach Earl Lloyd who, a decade earlier had scouted Scott and recommended that he be the Pistons top pick. Two years later he was name

d NBA Coach of the Year, the first African-American to win the coveted award. From 1976 to 1979, Scott was Men’s Basketball Head Coach at Eastern Michigan University. Today, Ray lives with his family in Eastern Michigan, not far from Detroit. This is his first book. Charley Rosenis one of the most r

espected writers of books on basketball, including both fiction like NYT Notable Book The House of Moses All-Stars, and nonfiction like his telling of the Jack Molinas story in The Wizard of Odds. He has also been a sports commentator, at FOXSports.com and HoopsHype.com. He lives in Woodstock, N.Y.

1979 NBA draft進入發燒排行的影片

我們都有對潛力的偏好嗎？探討潛力推銷訊息與評價之中介機制、邊界條件

為了解決1979 NBA draft的問題，作者高琬宜 這樣論述：

如果要獲得他人的正向評價，你會怎麼做呢？近期有學者主張，相比於描繪過往取得的成就（已經獲得該領域的重要獎項），描述未來發展的潛力（高機率會獲得該領域的重要獎項）會帶來更為正向的評價，這樣的效果被稱為「對潛力的偏好」(Tormala et al., 2012)。為了解「對潛力的偏好」是否確實存在，本文將以兩個研究依序針對潛力推銷訊息的邊界條件以及中介機制進行探討。在實驗一中，透過複製Tormala等人(2012)的NBA選秀實驗（n = 158），試圖探討後果嚴重性對於潛力推銷訊息的調節效果。結果顯示不管在後果嚴重性高或低的情況下，參與者都有較高的機率選擇過往成就良好的標的，因此未能支持「對潛

力的偏好」觀點。而實驗二則將實驗場景設定為是否要贊助集資平台的產品（n = 233），探討後果嚴重性、成就推銷訊息是否會共同調節潛力推銷訊息與好奇心之間的關係，進而影響評價。結果顯示潛力推銷訊息僅在需要實際支付金錢（高後果嚴重性）且缺乏成就推銷訊息時，才會透過提升人們的好奇心，進而使他們對於集資產品產生更好的評價。由此可知，「對潛力的偏好」可能是存在的，但未必如先前學者所主張的一般普遍存在日常生活中。