Meta dividend的問題,透過圖書和論文來找解法和答案更準確安心。 我們找到下列股價、配息、目標價等股票新聞資訊

國立臺灣科技大學 營建工程系 洪嫦闈所指導 Joshua Antonio Adiputro的 The Effect of Ownership Structure and Ownership Concentration on Firm Performance in Construction Firms: Mediating Roles of Board Diversity, Capital Structure, and Product Diversification (2021),提出Meta dividend關鍵因素是什麼,來自於Ownership structure、Ownership concentration、Board diversity、Capital structure、Product diversification、Construction、Structural equation modeling、Mediator。

而第二篇論文國立政治大學 經濟學系 何靜嫺所指導 曾心儀的 ESG投資和基金風險 (2021),提出因為有 ESG 投資、基金風險、基金相關網絡、中心性的重點而找出了 Meta dividend的解答。

接下來讓我們看這些論文和書籍都說些什麼吧:

除了Meta dividend,大家也想知道這些:

The Effect of Ownership Structure and Ownership Concentration on Firm Performance in Construction Firms: Mediating Roles of Board Diversity, Capital Structure, and Product Diversification

為了解決Meta dividend的問題,作者Joshua Antonio Adiputro 這樣論述:

The study empirically examines the influence of a firm's ownership structure and concentration on multiple dimensions of its financial performance. Recent studies stated that different ownership structures and ownership concentration would lead to different firm strategies and corporate governance,

which are proven to directly and indirectly affect organizational performance based on the agency theory and resource dependency theory. Little attention has been paid to potential mediating factors affecting these relationships, especially for construction-related firms in transitional economies.

To address the gap, this study uses Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to test the mediating effect of board diversity, capital structure, and product diversification on the relationships between ownership and firm performance. Using data collected from 71 listed construction, developer, and real

estate firms at the Indonesian Stock Exchange from 2015 to 2019. The result shows that the partial government ownership and concentrated ownership have a better financial performance compared to their counterparts. Board diversity, capital structure, and product diversification play a mediating role

, but the effect varies depending on ownership structure and ownership concentration. Implications are discussed, and future research directions are provided.

ESG投資和基金風險

為了解決Meta dividend的問題,作者曾心儀 這樣論述:

近年來,全球ESG投資迎來爆炸性成長,先前國外研究主題;多偏重ESG投資的表現,因此我們的研究著重於ESG投資的風險。由於永續投資其主要的投資策略為"ESG負面篩選",會排除特定類型的企業,將大量的資金瞄準少數ESG表現佳的公司或共同基金,導致這些股票和基金的相關性越來越強。為了研究這些相關性的影響,我們使用晨星公司的樣本,並使用 "逆夏普比率 "來衡量基金風險。結果表明,基金的ESG表現與基金風險存在顯著的正向關係。當我們將ESG拆分為個別E/S/G得分時,研究結果顯示,如果一檔基金持有較多社會面(S)表現好的公司,比較不會受到,基金持股相關性增加造成的負面影響。接續,為了研究基金網絡中的

傳染效應,我們構建了基金相關網絡(Fund Correlation Network),並使用 "中心性 "指標來衡量一個基金在這個網絡中的重要性。結果顯示,基金在網絡中的中心度越高,它就越能接受來自其他基金的傳染性風險,從而承擔更高的風險。當研究不同基金規模的子群體時,結果顯示,大型基金的傳染效應比小型基金的傳染效應要高得多(幾乎是四倍)。