admitted to用法的問題，透過圖書和論文來找解法和答案更準確安心。 我們找到下列股價、配息、目標價等股票新聞資訊

Bryson’s Dictionary of Troublesome Words

為了解決admitted to用法的問題，作者Bryson, Bill 這樣論述：

如果你──☆工作與生活上常用到英文☆想增強英文實力，希望把英文學得更漂亮、更精準☆喜歡英文，想了解單字背後的文化內涵這本書是您案頭絕不可少的實用良伴！比爾‧布萊森從使用者的角度，提醒大家常拼錯、常誤用的字，解釋標點符號的正確用法，及某些專有名詞的典故，甚至列出知名報章雜誌也用錯的文法！當然，還不忘偶爾展現獨一無二的幽默！ ★本書中譯本由天下文化出版。 作者簡介比爾‧布萊森(Bill Bryson)1951年出生在美國愛荷華州首府第蒙市（Des Moines），年輕歲月也在該地度過，成年後多半時間住在英國。曾任職於《波茅斯夜報》（Bournemouth Evening Echo）、《金融週報》（

Financial Weekly）與《泰晤士報》，並為《獨立報》創刊記者之一。著作包括《布萊森之英語簡史》（Mother Tongue）、《布萊森之英文超正典》（Byrson's Dictionary of Troublesome Words），以及《一腳踩進小美國》、《歐洲在發酵》、《哈！小不列顛》、《別跟山過不去》、《請問這裡是美國嗎？》、《澳洲烤焦了》等旅遊作品，和科普作品《萬物簡史》。目前和妻子及四個小孩住在英國諾福克（Norfolk）。 One of the English language's most skilled and beloved writers guides us a

ll toward precise, mistake-free grammar. As usual Bill Bryson says it best: "English is a dazzlingly idiosyncratic tongue, full of quirks and irregularities that often seem willfully at odds with logic and common sense. This is a language where 'cleave' can mean to cut in half or to hold two halv

es together; where the simple word 'set' has 126 different meanings as a verb, 58 as a noun, and 10 as a participial adjective; where if you can run fast you are moving swiftly, but if you are stuck fast you are not moving at all; and] where 'colonel, ' 'freight, ' 'once, ' and 'ache' are strikingly

at odds with their spellings." As a copy editor for the London Times in the early 1980s, Bill Bryson felt keenly the lack of an easy-to-consult, authoritative guide to avoiding the traps and snares in English, and so he brashly suggested to a publisher that he should write one. Surprisingly, the pr

oposition was accepted, and for "a sum of money carefully gauged not to cause embarrassment or feelings of overworth," he proceeded to write that book--his first, inaugurating his stellar career. Now, a decade and a half later, revised, updated, and thoroughly (but not overly) Americanized, it has

become Bryson's Dictionary of Troublesome Words, more than ever an essential guide to the wonderfully disordered thing that is the English language. With some one thousand entries, from "a, an" to "zoom," that feature real-world examples of questionable usage from an international array of publicat

ions, and with a helpful glossary and guide to pronunciation, this precise, prescriptive, and--because it is written by Bill Bryson--often witty book belongs on the desk of every person who cares enough about the language not to maul or misuse or distort it. Bill Bryson’s bestselling books includ

e A Walk in the Woods, The Life and Times of the Thunderbolt Kid, and A Short History of Nearly Everything (which won the Aventis Prize in Britain and the Descartes Prize, the European Union’s highest literary award). He was chancellor of Durham University, England’s third oldest university, from 20

05 to 2011, and is an honorary fellow of Britain’s Royal Society. Aa, an. Errors involving the indefinite articles a and an are almost certainly more often a consequence of haste and carelessness than of ignorance. They are especially common when numbers are involved, as here: ”Cox will contribute

10 percent of the equity needed to build a ＄80 million cable system” (Washington Post). Make it an. Occasionally the writer and editor together fail to note how an abbreviation is pronounced: ”He was assisted initially by two officers from the sheriff’s department and a FBI agent drafted in from the

bureau’s Cleveland office” (Chicago Tribune). When the first letter of an abbreviation is pronounced as a vowel, as in FBI, the preceding article should be an, not a.abbreviations, contractions, acronyms. Abbreviation is the general term used to describe any shortened word. Contractions and acronym

s are types of abbreviation. A contraction is a word that has been squeezed in the middle, so to speak, but has retained one or more of its opening and closing letters, as with Mr. for Mister and can’t for cannot. An acronym is a word formed from the initial letter or letters of a group of words, as

with radar for radio detecting and ranging, and NATO for North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Abbreviations that are not pronounced as words (IBM, ABC, NFL) are not acronyms; they are just abbreviations.Whether to write NATO or Nato is normally a matter of preference or house style. American publica

tions tend to capitalize all the letters of abbreviations, even when they are pronounced as words. In Britain, generally the convention is to capitalize only the initial letter when the abbreviation is pronounced as a word and is reasonably well known. Thus most British publications would write Aids

and Nato (but probably not Seato). For abbreviations of all types, try to avoid an appearance of clutter and intrusiveness. Rather than make repeated reference to ”the IGLCO” or ”NOOSCAM,” it is nearly always better to refer to the abbreviated party as ”the committee,” ”the institute,” or whatever

other word is appropriate.Finally, for the benefit of travelers who may have wondered why the British so often dispense with periods on the ends of abbreviations (writing Mr, Dr, and St where Americans would write Mr., Dr., and St.), it’s helpful to know that the convention in Britain is to include

a period when the abbreviation stops in the midst of a word (as with Capt. and Prof., for instance) but to leave off the period when the last letter of the abbreviation is the last letter of the full word--that is, when it is a contraction.accessible. Not -able.accommodate. One of the most misspelle

d of all words. Note -mm-.accompanist. Not -iest.acidulous, assiduous. Acidulous means tart or acid. Assiduous means diligent.acolyte. Not -ite.acoustics. As a science, the word is singular (”Acoustics was his line of work”). As a collection of properties, it is plural (”The acoustics in the auditor

ium were not good”).acronyms. See abbreviations, contractions, acronyms.activity. Often a sign of prolixity, as here: ”The warnings followed a week of earthquake activity throughout the region” (Independent). Just make it ”a week of earthquakes.”acute, chronic. These two are sometimes confused, whic

h is a little odd, as their meanings are sharply opposed. Chronic pertains to lingering conditions, ones that are not easily overcome. Acute refers to those that come to a sudden crisis and require immediate attention. People in the Third World may suffer from a chronic shortage of food. In a bad ye

ar, their plight may become acute.a.d. anno Domini (Lat.), ”in the year of the Lord.” a.d. should be written before the year (a.d. 25) but after the century (fourth century a.d.) and is usually set in small caps. See also anno domini and b.c.adage. Even the most careful users of English frequently,

but unnecessarily, refer to an ”old adage.” An adage is by definition old.adapter, adaptor. The first is one who adapts (as in a book for theatrical presentation); the second is the device for making appliances work abroad and so on.adjective pileup. Many journalists, in an otherwise commendable att

empt to pack as much information as possible into a confined space, often resort to the practice of piling adjectives in front of the subject, as in this London Times headline: ”Police rape claim woman in court.” Apart from questions of inelegance, such headlines can be confusing, to say the least.

A hurried reader, expecting a normal subject-verb-object construction, could at first conclude that the police have raped a claim-woman in court before the implausibility of that notion makes him go back and read the headline again. Readers should never be required to retrace their steps, however sh

ort the journey. Although the practice is most common in headlines, it sometimes crops up in text, as here: ”The new carburetor could result in an up to 35 percent improvement in gas mileage” (Des Moines Register). The ungainliness here could instantly be eliminated by making it ”an improvement in m

ileage of up to 35 percent.”administer. Not administrate.admit to is nearly always wrong, as in these examples: ”The Rev. Jesse Jackson had just admitted to fathering a child with an adoring staffer” (Baltimore Sun); ”Pretoria admits to raid against Angola” (Guardian headline); ”Botha admits to erro

rs on Machel cash” (Independent headline). Delete to in each case. You admit a misdeed, you do not admit to it.advance planning is common but always redundant. All planning must be done in advance.adverse, averse. Occasionally confused. Averse means reluctant or disinclined (think of aversion). Adve

rse means hostile and antagonistic (think of adversary).

admitted to用法進入發燒排行的影片

論網路連結行為之著作權侵權認定—以大陸「信息網絡傳播權」為中心

為了解決admitted to用法的問題，作者劉思萌 這樣論述：

隨著網際網路技術的發展，超連結(Hyperlink)作為實現不同資訊之間相互連結的橋梁，形式呈現多樣化。包括普通超連結、深度連結(Deep linking)、視框連結(Frame linking)與嵌入式連結(Embedded linking)。而關於不同類型超連結之具體界定，尚未有統一定論。不僅如此，包括中國大陸在內的國家和地區，雖然對於普通超連結行為判斷除歐盟外均持「伺服器標準」，然而對以視框連結為代表的深度連結行為之判斷卻存在不同標準，歸根結底在於新型連結的呈現模式，使行為人和著作人的利益天平發生了傾斜。提供以視框連結為代表的深度連結是否構成著作權之直接侵害，中國大陸學界存在「伺服器標

準」、「用戶感知標準」、「實質呈現標準」、「法律標準」與「間接提供標準」等，不同標準的提出都有其一定的理由，最終的認定也會不一樣。而美國則是通過Perfect10案確立了「伺服器標準」，但在之後的Jason案和Goldman案卻認為「伺服器標準」不符合美國著作權法之精神，並且承認了提供視框連結行為構成直接侵權。而歐盟則是通過Svensson案、Bestwater案與GS案逐漸建立起以「新公眾標準」為基礎的獨立判斷標準，歐盟法院同時否認了視框連結與普通連結的差異性。台灣則與美國類似，關於提供視框連結是否構成直接侵權，雖存在智財局之釋函認定視框連結和普通超連結沒有區別，但仍有一些法院認為構成直接侵

權。本文作者結合大陸、美國、歐盟及台灣實踐經驗，認為網路連結行為統一標準迫在眉睫，建議通過嚴格區分超連結類型、區別對待個人提供者和平台提供者以及最終確定標準三步來實現。