Amzn stock price的問題,透過圖書和論文來找解法和答案更準確安心。 我們找到下列股價、配息、目標價等股票新聞資訊

另外網站Amazon.com Inc. Stock Quote (U.S.: Nasdaq) - AMZN也說明:AMZN | Complete Amazon.com Inc. stock news by MarketWatch. View real-time stock prices and stock quotes for a full financial overview.

國立臺北大學 資訊工程學系 楊致芳所指導 宋晉德的 應用多類別支持向量機做限價委託簿之價格趨勢預測 (2019),提出Amzn stock price關鍵因素是什麼,來自於支持向量機、限價委託簿。

而第二篇論文國立政治大學 應用經濟與社會發展英語碩士學位學程(IMES) 楊子霆、羅光達所指導 孔美玲的 政治人物,推特與金融市場: 來自川普推特的證據 (2018),提出因為有 川普、合成控制法、推特、股價、匯率的重點而找出了 Amzn stock price的解答。

最後網站Why is the stock price of Amazon falling?則補充:The stock price of Amazon is down by 31.19%, underperforming the Nasdaq-100 over the last 12 months, which is down by 16.27% over the same ...

接下來讓我們看這些論文和書籍都說些什麼吧:

除了Amzn stock price,大家也想知道這些:

應用多類別支持向量機做限價委託簿之價格趨勢預測

為了解決Amzn stock price的問題,作者宋晉德 這樣論述:

我們的論文主要有兩個主題:機器學習和限價單(LOB)。在第一個主題中,我們專注於機器學習,尤其是支持向量機(SVM)。在第二個主題中,LOB 數據集來自 Lobster學術研究數據集。該數據集在 2012 年 6 月 21 日包含納斯達克股票市場數據,包括AAPL、GOOG、AMZN、INTC和MSFT。順便說一下,我們的研究使用AAPL、GOOG和AMZN股票。LOB數據集是免費和公開。 我們改善了A.N. Kercheval和Y. Zhang的方法,其用於在LOB數據中捕獲特徵。我們在bid-ask spread crossing趨勢預測方面的表現,優於A.N. Kerch

eval和Y.Zhang的方法。此外,我們的研究,還與J.Han等人的方法進行比較,我們建立了C和Sigma的準確度地圖,並提出一個開放的想法,即AAPL和GOOG的特徵,具有相同的複雜性。

政治人物,推特與金融市場: 來自川普推特的證據

為了解決Amzn stock price的問題,作者孔美玲 這樣論述:

The use of Twitter as a key political communication tool has become synonymous with U.S. President Donald Trump’s regime. However, Trump’s tweets can also tend to be unabashedly critical of companies, states, and other political figures. Whether or not these negative tweets have an impact on financ

ial markets is debatable. This paper uses the synthetic control method (SCM) to examine the effects of Trump’s negative trade- and business-related tweets on financial markets, particularly stock prices and exchange rates. Three publicly traded U.S. companies (Boeing, Amazon, Harley-Davidson) and th

ree currencies (Euro, Canadian dollar, Mexican peso) were chosen, while 1-2 tweets were collected for each treatment unit. To create the synthetic control for each treatment unit, extensive control unit data was also collected. Then, for each treatment unit, two synthetic control models were created

, with one model containing all outcome lags and all covariates whilst the other contained all outcome lags and some covariates. We found that for each treatment unit, the two models were similar, indicating that the results were robust. Overall, we found that results varied depending on the “target

” of Trump’s tweets, with the causal effect being most significant for Amazon and Mexico, likely due to the fact that traders or investors may react differently to Trump’s tweets and may base their decisions on certain company- or country-specific characteristics or features, such as type of industr

y, trade ties, and geographical proximity, among others.